span.p-content div[id^=div-gpt] { line-height: 0px; font-size: 0px;} After President accused on Wednesday morning of hurting local retailers and jobs by not paying taxes, the company’s shares dipped in premarket trading.
“is doing great damage to paying retailers. Towns, cities and states throughout the U.S. are being hurt — many jobs being lost!” he tweeted Wednesday morning, echoing his earlier characterizations of the company as a “no-monopoly” that does not pay “internet taxes.”
Mr. Trump’s suggestion that does not pay taxes is false. The company, in its latest annual report to the Securities and Exchange Commission, said that it paid $177 million in income taxes in 2014, $273 million in 2015 and $412 million last year.
S&P Global Market Intelligence found that paid an average rate covering federal, state, local and foreign taxes of 13 percent from 2007 to 2015, according to analysis provided to The New York Times. That is a smaller share than the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock average of 26.9 percent, and the federal corporate rate of 35 percent, but on par with Mr. Trump’s proposed 15 percent rate.
If Mr. Trump’s point was that did not collect sales taxes — which are owed by the purchaser and collected by the retailer — it is true that the company once avoided doing so.
“If this was five years ago, the tweet would be making a very compelling point,” said Carl Davis, the research director of the left-leaning Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. Historically, “there is no doubt that used its ability to not collect sales to gain a competitive advantage.”
But that criticism is outdated.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1992 that a state can require retailers to collect a sales only if they have a physical presence in that state, so an out-of-state e-commerce company with no store or distribution center in that state has no obligation to do so. Several states have enacted broad laws, colloquially called “laws,” that attempt to counteract this disparity between e-commerce and brick-and-mortar businesses.
As recently as 2012, was collecting a sales in only five states, according Mr. Davis. He also noted that “cut ties with in-state businesses to avoid collecting sales tax” in several states between 2009 and 2014.
During this time period, liberal think tanks and analysts made the same point as Mr. about Amazon’s effect on localities.
“Amazon’s refusal to collect sales in most states hurts state and local governments’ ability to finance education, health care and other services,” the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said in 2010.
The company began to collect sales taxes in 2012 in California, where it began to build warehouses, as well as in Texas, Pennsylvania and other states, The Times reported. By the end of 2016, Amazon’s collection had expanded to 29 states, according to Mr. Davis.
And as of this April, has collected sales taxes in all states that have one. (Five states — Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon — do not.) does not, however, require third-party sellers on its marketplace to collect sales taxes, but offers the service to them.
“Other large e-retailers, most notably eBay, generally do not collect sales still,” said Joseph Henchman, the executive vice president of the free-market-oriented Foundation. Amazon, on the other hand, “ultimately changed their position.” ©2017 The New York Times News Service

Receive News & Ratings Via Email - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.